Table of Contents
Former Indian cricketer Robin Uthappa has addressed recent reports regarding an arrest warrant issued against him in connection with alleged fraud related to Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) deposits.
Details of the arrest warrant
According to a report by Times of India, the warrant demands Uthappa to pay INR 23,36,602 in outstanding dues. The ex-India opener, listed as a director o🏅f Centaurus Lifestyl༺e Brands Pvt. Ltd in Bengaluru, has been asked to appear before the commissioner by December 27. The warrant also authorizes his arrest if the dues and processing fee of INR 5000 are not paid within the stipulated time.
Also READ: 5 Rajasthan Roy😼als (RR) players𒁏 who made a strong impact in Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy 2024
Robin Uthappa’s response to reports of alleged EPF fraud
In response to the allegations, Uthappa has eleased a statement to c♔larify his position regarding his involvement with the companies in question, namely Strawberry Lenceria Pvt. Ltd, Centaurus Lifestyle Brands Pvt. Ltd and Berryz Fashion House.
“In light of recent news of the PF case against me, I would like to provide some clarification with regards to my involvement with these companies,” Uthappa stated, as quoted by TOI.
He explained that he was appointed as a director in these companies during 2018-19 due to financial contributions he made to them as loans. However, the Karnataka-lad emphasized that he was never actively involved in their day-to-day operations. “I did not have an active executive role, nor was I involved in the day-to-day operations of the businesses. Given my demanding schedule as a professional cricketer, TV presenter and commentator, neither did I have the time nor expertise to participate in their operations. In fact, I do not play an executive role in any other companies I have funded, till date,” he said.
Uthappa further revealed that the cไompanies failed to repay the loans he had extended, prompting him to initiate legal proceedings, which remain ongoing. The 39-year-old also cleared that he resigned from his directorships years ago.
“When the Provident Fund authorities issued notices demanding payment of dues, my legal team responded, highlighting that I had no role in these companies and provided documentation from the companies themselves confirming my lack of involvement. Despite this, the Provident Fund authorities have continued with proceedings,” he said.
Uthappa assured that his legal advisors are actively working on the𝓡 matter and that appropriate steps will🔯 be taken to resolve the issue in the coming days.
